Other Preble County Investigations...

[admin]

We understand that there have been/are other local incidents in Preble County which may be lacking in investigation or professionalism.

Our motive in adding this General Board is to establish a pattern of possible unprofessionalism by local authorities in other cases and incidents. Documents for the triple homicide case were created by local authorities, and some documents are just plain missing. They were not enough for the judicial entity that was approached to reach any conclusions. We hope to re-open this case by establishing good reason for intervention through a higher authority by showing a pattern of doubt in the professionalism displayed in other local incidents.

This is for the purpose of information only. We encourage the general use of descriptive encounters without the use of actual names if at all possible. "I met with the prosecutor/sheriff/investigator, etc" is requested rather than than "I met with Mr/Mrs X".

We are NOT a lynch mob, and will not tolerate the attack of persons by name - the naming of individuals should take place when you have the opportunity to sit face to face with a higher investigating authority. We are not paranoid that all law enforcement is "out to get us" or "bad". However, we have had the misfortune of encountering incidents and professionals that we have a right to have certain expectations of. We all have a right to have these situations dealt with in a lawful and respectful manner.

Thank you for your cooperation and sharing your experiences.

[saywhat]

Admin wrote:

We are NOT a lynch mob, and will not tolerate the attack of persons by name - the naming of individuals should take place when you have the opportunity to sit face to face with a higher investigating authority. We are not paranoid that all law enforcement is "out to get us" or "bad". However, we have had the misfortune of encountering incidents and professionals that we have a right to have certain expectations of. We all have a right to have these situations dealt with in a lawful and respectful manner.


Very good disission. That means alot and that shows you are trying to be fair. For that reason I will keep reading your board and posts.

[blazer]

Preble County / Geauga County Corruption Ties???:

IN GEAUGA COURT OF COMMON PLEAS
IN Preble County Court

In Attorney General's Office

In Office of the Governor

In Judicial Council of The Sixth Circuit

elsewhere

RE: further unlawful and illegal activities performed by members of Geauga County Court, Geauga County Prosecutor's Office, Geauga County CSED, Geauga County Sheriff's Department, pursuant:

fraudulent Brahier v. Brahier

Notices to parties concerning such activities and resultant action.

On the 21st day of August of 2004, Preble County Sheriff Deputies (2) and a Ohio State Highway Patrolman attempted to arrest Maurice Edward, Brahier on Capias issued on the 22nd day of October of 2003, by clerk of court in Geauga County for Court of Common Pleas. Allegation extended/reason for issuance was for a supposed failure to appear for a SHOW OF CAUSE hearing on the 14th day of October of 2003.

Inquiry was placed to officers to verify this Capias as no ORDER had been received by Maurice.

Arrest was not performed as the Capias could not be verified.

Maurice proceeded to write a document to the Geauga County Clerk of Court, which he faxed to that Court and elsewhere as so noted upon the document (copy attached). Document is listed as Geauga-Preble-Sixth Ct-New false arrest and imprisonment attempt-Aug 22 04.doc (as documented in the Administrative Council of the Sixth Circuit Court).

Preble County Sheriff Deputies came back that morning (22nd) after verifying supposed validity of Capias. Maurice Edward, Brahier was thereafter incarcerated in Preble County pending pick-up by Geauga County Sheriff Officers. Preble Sheriff deputies, and later jail personnel, were advised of the document which was to be placed in Preble County Court.

Sheriff Officers and or jail Officers refused to fax or hand deliver document to the Preble court (verifiable by two written requests in Preble Jail files).

Preble County Court (at televised hearing) was apprised of afore stated document in Maurice's possession. Court and or judge made no effort to obtain or review the document.

Maurice verbally advised judge of unlawful activities occurring in Geauga County and the resultant unlawful activities [such as false arrest and imprisonment] in which Preble County was now involved.

Judge indicated he would supposedly advise the Preble County Prosecutor Office and have them contact Maurice. No such activity apparently occurred. Instead, transportation was authorized by Preble judge.

In the first person, the injured Maurice Edward, Brahier

I was transported to Geauga County by Geauga County Sheriff's Officers and held unlawfully in Geauga County Jail pending a supposed SHOW OF CAUSE, over which the court had neither authority to hold (due to the lawful ending of such in the seventh month of 2003) or authority to review or issue orders or judgment, save what had been requested in the relief of the timed Motion to Dismiss and other Notices.

Supposed plaintiff's of that state action had been afforded opportunity to respond, deny, or otherwise upon the record. No response or otherwise was entered.

Notices were placed upon the Geauga court record concerning the Motion to Dismiss, resultant failures by respondent plaintiffs, request for relief as exhibited upon Maurice's Motions and or Notices.

I requested a copy of the supposed ORDER, which had not been sent to me, concerning suposed FAILURE TO APPEAR and Capias issuance.

--------- THE THIRD SUPPOSED HEARING CONCERNING THE SHOW OF CAUSE

Forrest W. Burt stated he had received the afore stated faxed document [attached](though it was sent to the clerk) upon opening of the supposed hearing. I reminded him of the Motion to Dismiss, and the action had lawfully ended in the 7th month of 2003 through use of proper procedure.

The SHOW OF CAUSE hearing was allowed to continue by Forrest W. Burt, flaunting the unlawful aspects of the allowance.



Attending this supposed hearing were representatives of GEAUGA COUNTY PROSECUTOR OFFICE and GEAUGA COUNTY CHILD SUPPORT ENFORCEMENT AGENCY {JOBS AND FAMILY SERVICES}.

Prosecutor attempted to bring issue of supposed Order to continually advise court of my work; seeking work; and other, via Agency representative.

Prosecutor and CSED Agency representative presented as purported evidence a sum certain of supposed child support owned by myself, with poundages, arrearages, and other.

Prosecutor extended as supposed fact, Orders, which were supposedly issued by the Geauga Court.

---

Upon my cross-examination of the Agency representative, the issue of the Agency's participation in seeking review of Geauga Court orders; sought within another state [Kentucky] was again raised. Which had been extended to that state through and by perjuries in affidavit by Gail S. Brahier, and Lake County Prosecutor's Office, and the CSED Agency in Lake county, as they were directly involved in the commission of state and federal felonies, and state and federal violations of rights.

I thereafter addressed (again, issue had been raised in the two (2) prior hearings of this same issue) the fact that the CSED Agency, which she was representing, had been informed of this unlawful and criminal activity, as had the Lake County Prosecutor's Office, the CSED Agency of that county, and numerous others such as Robert Taft {then Secretary of State, the party certifying the documents to Kentucky} [previously addressed under federal complaint ' see records: Maurice Edward, Brahier vs. {parties} Western District Court].

I questioned (again, issue raised in prior hearings) whether she had any information whether Lake County or the Agency, which she represented, had ever civilly or criminally prosecuted Gail S. Brahier for this unlawful and illegal activity as required by law and responsibility.

Her response was she had no information.

I questioned (again, this question had been raised in the prior hearings) whether the Agency had finally brought or attempted to obtain the fact that I had been injured do to the false arrest and imprisonment in a Kentucky prison due to this unlawful and criminal activity, (to which she, as the Agency's representative was now a fellow conspirator) from Social Security as had been exposed during prior supposed SHOW OF CAUSE hearings.

The reply was only that the Agency had found that I had been injured.

I questioned (again, issue has been repeatedly raised over 13 years) whether she was aware that by bringing this action to the court or appearing in the court, she was knowingly, willingly, and willfully aiding and abetting violators of the law, and as such, became an active participant. No response.

I questioned (again, issue raised repeatedly in prior hearings) whether she was aware that ignorance of the law or of conspiracy does not absolve any party of guilt or complicity, particularly when that party has been advised of such, nor does such provide immunities to any involved. No response.

I questioned whether she or the Agency, having been repeatedly advised over the course of some thirteen years, had ever investigated the facts which I had presented to the Agency concerning illegal and unlawful activities in the county, the court, and other; or had advised any proper authorities as was required by law and responsibilities.

She had no information.

I again advised this supposed witness and CSED Agency representative, of the unlawful and illegal occurrences in the court, the county, and various applicable unlawful and or illegal activities; and resultant legal aspects, such as the participation in perjuries and violations of rights; and the civil and criminal prosecution at the state and federal level for participation.

Other matter was addressed as more fully set forth upon the record.

--

Forrest W. Burt excused the witness for the prosecution, and asked whether I had any witnesses for defense. Of course the matter had been attended to previously, over the course of these thirteen or so years, as is displayed upon the face of the 1400+ documents in court record to which I had previously directed him. Yet this supposed judge needs witnesses from an unlawfully arrested and imprisoned party before his court, from another county's jurisdiction.

However, since Forrest W. Burt was knowingly conspiring with these others, he instead suggested I should allow him to examine me. I made distinct statements regarding such (review of the record is required), and granted limited opportunity.

Immediately upon being placed under Oath, I swore to the validity of all presented issues in documents which I submitted in the court's records. Moreover, I swore to all presented material issues which I had raised at that unlawful hearing.

Questions were placed to me by Forrest W. Burt concerning:

Whether I had work (he was well aware that I did as that had been presented in the prior SHOWS OF CAUSE),

where I worked (also previously presented),

income (none, as had already been placed in the records),

the injury (also presented in prior hearings),

other as is displayed upon the record.

I again advised the judge of the unlawfulness of the hearing, his knowing active participation in unlawful and illegal activities, and other.

---

Forrest W. Burt questioned the prosecutor on concerning what she requested for relief. The prosecutor suggested 30 or more days in jail, seek work order, and other relief.

Forrest W. Burt issued determination that I would spend seven days in jail, I would pay the costs of this unlawful and illegal proceeding, and the prosecutor would write the order. An order which can not be issued, in a matter over which the court had no jurisdiction, in a matter finalized in the seventh month of 2003.

---

On the 14th of September the court finally issued the supposed JUDGMENT ENTRY concerning the hearing on August 27th of 2004. However, review of the envelope (copy attached) shows this was not mailed until September 24th of 2004 by David P. Joyce of Geauga county Prosecutor Office.

What is patently displayed by this continuing course of conduct is thus:

I. Forrest W. Burt is unfit to hold a bench in these United States.
II. Forrest W. Burt should be immediately be placed under investigation for apparent complicity with other attorneys, prosecutors, and other parties at the local and perhaps state level, for misuse, abuse, misfeasance, malfeasance, nonfeasance, unlawful and or illegal civil and or criminal activities, and or other as might be found during investigation. There is sufficient evidence available upon the face of the record for reasons for this investigation.
III. The Geauga County Prosecutor's Office should also be placed under investigation, for the office's furtherance of and participation in apparent abuse, misuse, misfeasance, malfeasance, nonfeasance, and other as might be found during investigation. There is sufficient evidence available upon the face of the records for reason for this investigation. It is beyond debate, that they are actively engaged in unlawful and illegal activities.
IV. Geauga County, in general should be investigated by state and federal authorities for the apparent corruption of it's legal and judicial system, which appears to contaminate the entire county.
V. Geauga County can not apparently be trusted to police itself, therefore, state and federal investigators should be brought to the county to review its court, fiscal, and other records for unlawful and or illegal civil or criminal activities as such is apparently covered up by the local judiciary.
VI. The Geauga County Bar Association should also be placed under investigation for allowing these types of unlawful and or illegal civil and criminal activities to continue within the county.
VII. Preble County apparently believes it may fail to protect the people of the county from unlawful and or illegal activities. It is apprent that this county should also be investigated for participation in unlawful and illegal activities.


Wherefore, again I place Notice that these unlawful and illegal activities will be presented to the authorities under request for this investigation. Moreover, I object to being continually subjected to this unlawful and criminal activity perpetrated by these parties. This is formal complaint.

Maurice Edward, Brahier nemo me impune laccasit